Global Energy and Moisture Budgets of the Atmosphere

Kevin E. Trenberth and David P. Stepaniak

Extended abstract of invited paper which will be presented at the SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REANALYSES, 23 to 27 August 1999, Wokefield Park, Mortimer, Reading, UK.

National Center for Atmospheric Research
P. O. Box 3000
Boulder, CO 80307

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

In addition to NCAR's postal address, Kevin E. Trenberth may be contacted via:

email: trenbert@cgd.ucar.edu
voice: (303) 497 1318
fax: (303) 497 1333


Abstract

A description is given of the vertically-integrated global heat, energy and moisture budgets based upon the reanalyses from European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/NCAR over the period 1979-1993. The full resolution data four-times daily on model coordinates are used to obtain the best accuracy possible but are compared with the best achievable results using the pressure level archive. We first analyze the mass budget, which is found to contain large errors, and the subsequent budgets have to be adjusted before sensible results can be achieved. From atmospheric data we compute for each month the storage tendency terms for internal, potential, kinetic, and latent energy, and the overall energy transport composed of the kinetic energy and moist static energy. The divergence of the latter with the tendency should equal the so-called Q1 (diabatic heating) and Q2 (latent heating) contributions along with a small frictional term. These can also be equated with the net radiative flux through the top of the atmosphere plus the net heat flux through the surface (Fig. 1). In spite of the magnitude of the adjustment for mass imbalances, and known errors and large discrepancies in the moisture budgets, the results for the global energy budgets are remarkably robust and reproducible among the different analyses in gross character. This is because there is strong cancellation between the Q1 and Q2 arising from the conversion of moist static energy through latent heating into dry static energy. For the period of the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (1985-1989) when top-of-the atmosphere fluxes can be well defined, the result is interpretable in terms of surface fluxes and can be compared with alternative estimates (e.g., from bulk flux parameterizations and assimilation model estimates). Results, especially at times of special interest, such as during major El Niño events, will be presented. Large changes of >100 W m-2 are evident and will be related to changes in global temperatures.

Figure 1 presents a schematic of the components given in the vertically integrated energy budget of the atmosphere, along with simplified equations. Figures 2 and 3 present summary results of the total divergent energy transport and its divergence for two different Januaries, those of January 1989 (Fig. 2) and January 1998 (Fig. 3) based on the NCEP/NCAR reanalyses. The bottom panel shows the actual vectors of the vertically integrated transport and its potential function, while the top panel shows the divergence in W m-2. Because the changes in the top of the atmosphere fluxes are of the order of 10 W m-2, most of this field relates to the net fluxes at the surface out of the ocean. Similar results are obtained for the ECMWF reanalyses.

These two months are chosen because they occur at times of the peak in the most recent El Niño event (Fig. 3) and the last major La Niño in 1988-89 (Fig. 2). Therefore, comparing the tropical Pacific, we find that in 1989, when there was a strong cold dry tongue in the tropical eastern Pacific, the net flux is over 150 W m-2 into the ocean as the clear skies allow solar radiation to heat the ocean. In contrast, in 1998, under mature El Niño conditions the flux is mostly out of the ocean into the atmosphere, and this is no doubt a reason for the cooling of the ocean observed throughout this period and the record warmth seen in the global surface temperatures. The Pacific-North American (PNA) teleconnection pattern in the northern extratropics also reversed between these months. A strong negative PNA in January 1989 led to sea level pressure anomalies exceeding +18 mb at 45N in the Pacific in contrast to a deep Aleutian low with a sea level pressure anomaly of -10 mb in January 1998. The huge differences in the surface fluxes (Figs. 2 and 3) over the Kuroshio extension region are a direct consequence of this.

Also of note in these two figures is the contrast in the Labrador Sea, where a strong positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in January 1989 led to cold outbreaks over the northeast of Canada and Greenland, and over 250 W m-2 fluxes out of the ocean compared with a flux into the ocean in the same region in January 1998, when the NAO was weak.

Overall, the patterns seen here are reasonable: this is the northern winter when heat preferably goes into the southern oceans and out of the northern oceans, following the sun, and the main atmospheric transports are into the northern hemisphere. There is a strong land-sea contrast, as expected. Just a few weird features how up, such as positive values over parts of the southern oceans or Antarctica that are not reproducible and clearly relate to quality of the analyses. Results for other months will be presented.

This approach provides promise of better defining the atmosphere and ocean heat transports and the surface fluxes in a physically consistent framework. Prospects for determining the net diabatic heating associated with El Niño events are likely to lead to a paradigm change in how El Niño works and in defining its role in the global climate system.


Back to Publications List

To the Climate Analysis Section Home Page


Hongjun Zhang: zhangho@ucar.edu