Fig. 1: Correlation of climatological annual cycle, model - obs
(T and P Wilmott and Matsurra)
(% area r > 0.9)





Fig. 2: Model to model change in annual cycle correlation
% area b31.002, b31.006, or b31.007 better (+) and worse (-) than control (b31.001)
Only locations where change is > 0.1 (T) and > 0.2 (P) are included in area average





Fig. 3: Annual mean bias compared to obs





Fig. 4: Model vs model improvement in annual mean bias
% area b31.002, b31.006, or b31.007 better (+) and worse (-) than control (b31.001)
Only locations where change is statistically (t-test) and physically significant
are included in area average. Physical significance change > 1C (T) and > 0.5 mm/d (P)





Fig. 5: Standard deviation compared to obs (annual cycle amplitude)





Fig. 6: Model to model change in standard deviation
% area b31.002, b31.006, or b31.007 better (+) and worse (-) than control (b31.001)
Only locations where change is > 0.5 C (T) and > 0.5 mm/d (P)